Health behaviours in women: time elapsed since last mammogram and last PAP test, Laval1 and all of Québec, 2000-2001, 2003 and 2005

2000-2001 Estimated population 2003 Estimated population 2005 Estimated population






% 95% C.I.2 k % 95% C.I.2 k % 95% C.I.2 k

Laval
Mammogram3 (35 years and over)
  Less than two years 42.1 36.2 - 48.0 39.4 43.8 37.9 - 49.7 45.2 41.5 37.3 - 45.8 44.6
  Two years or more 22.7 17.7 - 27.7 21.2 23.5 18.5 - 28.5 24.2 26.6 22.6 - 30.5 28.5
  Never 35.2 29.5 - 40.9 32.9 32.7 27.2 - 38.3 33.8 31.9 27.7 - 36.2 34.3
PAP test3 (20 years and over)
  Less than three years 61.0 56.0 - 66.0 76.8 72.5 67.9 - 77.2 96.4 69.1 65.6 - 72.6 95.8
  Three years or more 16.3 12.7 - 20.5 20.5 16.8 13.1 - 21.1 22.3 16.9 14.1 - 19.8 23.5
  Never 22.7 18.4 - 27.0 28.6 10.7* 7.7 - 14.4 14.2 14.0 11.4 - 16.5 19.4
  
All of Québec
Mammogram (35 years and over)
  Less than two years 45.4 43.7 - 47.0 917.6 44.5 42.8 - 46.3 927.9 45.9 44.4 - 47.4 979.0
  Two years or more 20.6 19.2 - 21.9 416.1 24.1 22.6 - 25.6 501.5 24.0 22.8 - 25.3 512.1
  Never 34.0 32.5 - 35.6 688.4 31.4 29.8 - 33.0 654.8 30.0 28.6 - 31.5 640.0
PAP test (20 years and over)
  Less than three years 65.0 63.6 - 66.4 1,755.4 66.5 65.1 - 67.9 1,843.0 65.2 64.0 - 66.4 1,846.6
  Three years or more 14.9 13.9 - 15.9 402.0 17.3 16.1 - 18.4 478.7 18.0 17.1 - 19.0 510.5
  Never 20.1 19.0 - 21.3 544.1 16.3 15.2 - 17.4 451.0 16.8 15.8 - 17.7 474.5
  

1. Health region.
2. The 95% confidence interval (C.I.) indicates the limits around a sample estimate in which the true population value is expected to fail, 19 out of 20 times. When confidence intervals overlap, the difference is not considered statistically significant.
3. The cancer screening program counsels to have a mammogram every two years (women 50 to 69 years of age) and a Pap test every three years. It should be noted that these data do not distinguish women who undergo these exams for diagnosis purposes from those who undergo them for screening.
* Coefficient of variation between 15% and 25%; the estimate should be interpreted with caution.
  
Source: Statistics Canada, Canadian Community Health Survey, cycle 1.1 (2000-2001), cycle 2.1 (2003) and cycle 3.1 (2005), Public Use Microdata File (PUMF).
Compilation: Institut de la statistique du Québec, Direction Santé Québec.
 
May 7, 2009
           
Symbols used in tables